E. Tiurnev
To Win
D. Poljak
To Win
Roman Jebavy vs David Poljak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L W L L
Form
W W L W W W L W W WHead To Head: Jebavy 1 - 0 Poljak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jebavy winning 2 and Poljak winning 0. The last match between Jebavy and Poljak was at the Czech Republic F3, 25-05-2015, First, Clay with Roman Jebavy getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roman Jebavy | 1 |
| David Poljak | 0 |
Czech Republic F3(25-05-2015)
6
2
6
1
| Jebavy | Stats | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (21-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 897 | Ranking | 896 |
| 297 | Highest Rank | 370 |
| 35 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 6 |
| 55% (318-258) | Career Total W/L | 55% (342-277) |
| $1,945 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roman Jebavy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kaito Uesugi
Player
Roman Jebavy
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Jebavy
Player
Ondrej Valek
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tomas Liska
Player
Roman Jebavy
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
5
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Roman Jebavy
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Roman Jebavy
83%
(
63 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Jebavy
Player
Andrea Vavassori
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Roman Jebavy
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Jebavy
Player
Mehdi Jdi
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Roman Jebavy
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Kirill Kalennik
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
German Mingaleev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Gabriele Volpi
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Samuel Stolarik
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Poljak
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Simon Reveniau
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-7(11) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Louis Larue
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (318/258) | Win/Loss | 55% (342/277) |
| 54% (719/603) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (778/660) |
| 52% (6320/5922) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7119/6607) |
| 59% (82/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (114/75) |
| 55% (181/148) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) |
| 51% (55/53) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (118/89) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 166 | Aces Total | 2621 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 267 | Total Double Faults | 1609 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:6 |
| 568.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 512.09 |
| 62% (3024/4847) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22147/37107) |
| 64% (1936/3024) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15534/22147) |
| 45% (828/1823) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7265/14959) |
| 47% (231/490) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1509/3467) |
| 41% (1923/4651) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14262/36334) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (47/71) | Challenger W/L | 39% (44/69) |
| 59% (269/184) | Futures W/L | 59% (298/208) |
| 55% (312/566) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (337/613) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (64/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (98/191) |
| 50% (90/180) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/205) |
| 86% (319/273) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (339/283) |
| 14% (319/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (339/56) |
| 17% (257/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (280/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
